BookmakerLens

How We Rate

Evidence before scores

We do not publish a numerical rating until enough evidence has been collected. Profiles marked “Not rated” document what we can verify without implying that an operator is average, safe or recommended.

Our review criteria

  1. Licensing and ownership: regulator records, legal entity, approved domains and material restrictions.
  2. Country availability: whether the operator is authorised by the relevant national regulator—not merely accessible online.
  3. Payments and withdrawals: supported methods, stated limits, fees, verification requirements and processing rules.
  4. Sportsbook and product: market range, odds presentation, usability and relevant product restrictions.
  5. Terms and fairness: bonus conditions, dormant-account clauses, maximum payouts and account-closure rules.
  6. Support and transparency: accessible contact channels and consistency between promotional claims and legal terms.
  7. Safer gambling: limit, cooling-off and self-exclusion tools plus links to independent support.

Testing status

Research based only on published sources is labelled accordingly. We do not claim that deposits, withdrawals or support were tested unless a funded test was actually completed and documented.

Updates and conflicts

Reviews may change when licences, ownership, terms or country rules change. Affiliate relationships are disclosed and do not prevent a low score, warning or decision not to rate.

Research score: weights and scale

The Research score is a desk-research rating, not a hands-on test score. It combines six categories: licensing and ownership (30%), terms and transparency (20%), payments and KYC information (15%), market-availability clarity (15%), safer-gambling controls (10%) and product information (10%). Each category is scored from 0 to 10 using evidence available on the review date.

Score guide: 8.0–10.0 means unusually strong published evidence; 6.0–7.9 means generally clear evidence with limitations; 4.0–5.9 means material gaps or concerns; below 4.0 means weak, inconsistent or unverified evidence. A high score does not override local licensing restrictions and is not a recommendation to register.

Scores are rounded to one decimal place. When evidence cannot be verified, the relevant category is reduced rather than assumed. A future hands-on score would be labelled separately and would require documented account, support, deposit and withdrawal testing.